1. Latest News on COVID, mRNA Vaccines, and Health
2. Politics: Latest Interviews—Germany, Europe, and the World
3. A Fateful Election in Saxony-Anhalt. Our interviews with the AfD. A health expert and a district administrator answer our questions

“Fate is never a matter of chance, but a matter of choice.”
(Isaac Newton)

 

Dear Readers,

our country and the world are in turmoil. Or are many things that were previously upside down finally getting back on their feet? In any case, it’s going to be a turbulent fall. That’s what many are predicting. Whether politically, financially, or weather-wise, experts and forecasters anticipate turbulent times. For Germany, the upcoming state elections in Saxony-Anhalt, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, and Berlin, as well as upcoming local and mayoral elections (e.g., Rhineland-Palatinate), are important barometers of public sentiment for Merz and Klingbeil. Why do regional CDU and SPD lawmakers continue to remain silent about what—given the consequences—must be described as a betrayal of their own constituents’ interests? CDU and SPD county administrators and mayors of municipal associations can no longer stand by and watch as their party leaderships at the federal level thwart the work of local governments.

In a candid conversation, a county administrator gives us a glimpse behind the scenes. A member of the Bundestag and expert on health policy provides us with transparency regarding federal-level decision-making. It is becoming increasingly clear that the current governing parties are not concerned with finding solutions, but only with preventing the AfD. As a result, their own agenda is completely lost. By relying on the “firewall” and protecting their vested interests—just like the public broadcasters—they are maneuvering themselves into a dead end, since marginalizing the largest opposition party has not worked.

At the same time, the health policy successes of Kennedy and Trump are becoming increasingly evident. Dr. Fauci, who played a role in the U.S. as influential as Drosten’s in Germany and was long regarded almost as the embodiment “science,” is coming under increasing pressure. Senators and investigative journalists are exposing contradictions and unanswered questions; a legal investigation could also follow. Fauci himself is increasingly denying or downplaying his statements—apparently also because further comments carry the risk of incriminating him even more.

In Germany, by contrast, the hope for a genuine investigative committee at the federal level is fading fast. Instead of a ruthless investigation, political face-saving seems to be the priority. Once again, those suffering from post-COVID and post-vaccine syndrome are bearing the brunt. Their plight threatens to be overlooked, while the governing parties—with the exception of the AfD—are attempting to explain the serious missteps of recent years largely by citing the chaos, uncertainty, and complexity of the time. As a result, political accountability risks being reduced, in hindsight, to nothing more than a regrettable state of emergency.

This is not about run-of-the-mill corruption designed to boost pharmaceutical sales. In this case, it’s about deliberate missteps resulting in mass fatalities! Of course, every—and I emphasize EVERY—effort is being made to prevent this. Many have profited from it. However, the cover-up, ignorance, and lack of transparency will not help. There are too many people up in arms!

Our international initiative for a moratorium on mRNA substances continues. We are preparing a concept for an alliance of networks for both a conference of independent physicians and a conference of attorneys organized by the AfA at the end of November. I ask all networks dedicated to raising awareness and redesigning a holistic healthcare system, the rehabilitation of doctors and citizens sued under the unlawful COVID-19 measures regime, as well as those developing treatment guidelines, to contact me to consider participating: ds@sound-of-truth.com

Doing nothing hasn’t worked. Why not choose something different, try something new, and take an active role? Let’s get started. Enjoy the read!

Dirk Seeling and the CSmedicus team.

1. Latest news on COVID, mRNA vaccines, and health

Support the call for transparency regarding data and scrutiny of modified mRNA research:www.mwm-proof.com and sign the open appeal, launched by CSmedicus in collaboration with MWGFD and other national and international physician and research groups (e.g., WCH and North Group), as well as health experts from across the political spectrum. Excess mortality rates remain unexplained, causes are covered up, and those profiting from and responsible for the situation are protected. Send the brief information (available for download in many languages) with scientific references to your elected officials. More and more people are reassessing the situation. Let’s simply keep trying again and again to raise awareness: “This must never happen again, and that is why we must stop and reevaluate the unproven technology of modified mRNA products!”

Germany: Brandenburg Enquiry Commission, June 26, 2026 / Crime Scene: STIKO As early as July 16, Claudia Jaworski published a YouTube video about the Brandenburg COVID-19 enquiry held on June 26, on which she had worked for three weeks. The provocative title: “Crime Scene STIKO – Brandenburg Enquiry.” This video should reach even more people, which is why we’re highlighting it in this article. In her video, the activist explored whether the principle of “first, do no harm” still applies at all to the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), an 18-member expert group based at the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin. In 2021 and 2022, 600,000 pregnant women in Germany were administered gene-based experimental “vaccines” in Germany without these having first been tested on pregnant women based on evidence or their medium-term consequences having been clarified. As Jaworski reports, the former chair of STIKO, Prof. Dr. Überla, was therefore confronted with the following question at the Enquete Commission meeting: “Given what we know today, would you recommend vaccination for pregnant women?” She explained as follows…

There is more than just an initial suspicion that the 10–20% lower birth rate is causally linked to the mRNA substances. See the most comprehensive and best study on this topic by Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck et al. in our shop at www.sound-of-truth.com. Support the educators by purchasing our books.

NEW STUDY: COVID-19 vaccination in early pregnancy is linked to severe birth defects (2026)Is the COVID-19 vaccine safe for pregnant women in their first trimester? The official answer, disseminated by the WHO and national health authorities, has been unanimous for years: Yes, absolutely safe, strongly recommended. What doctors rarely mention: Until recently, there was no reliable data to actually support this claim. And now that the data is finally available, it points in a direction that is diametrically opposed to the recommendations. A newly published registry-based cohort study by Seyed-Abdolvahab Taghavi et al… Former U.S. presidential advisor Fauci was aware of potential miscarriage risks very early on but did not publish his findings.
As early as 2021, he and other staff members, scientists, and doctors were aware of this. This has been proven by newly released documents.

Amnesty & Rehabilitation Following COVID-19 Measures – BSW Brandenburg Commissions Study Righting Wrong – Overcoming Division. The BSW parliamentary group’s press conference in the Brandenburg State Parliament on the occasion of commissioning a brief academic study on the topic “International Experiences with Amnesty and Rehabilitation Provisions in Connection with COVID-19 Measures” took place on August 18, 2026. Participants included: Christian Dorst, spokesperson on COVID-19 policy for the BSW-Brandenburg parliamentary group; Dr. Beate Sibylle Pfeil, lawyer and author of the study [via video link]; and Dr. Mona Aranea, sociologist and author of the study. From the very beginning, the BSW parliamentary group has advocated that the Brandenburg State Parliament address the issue of a so-called COVID-19 amnesty law.

New “vaccines”: This new mRNA replicates itself in the body
A conversation hosted by Sören Schumann with former Pfizer toxicologist Dr. Helmut Sterz and Prof. Dr. Stefan Hockertz, an expert on pharmaceutical approvals and vaccine advocate who was forced to flee to Switzerland by German authorities. The specific trajectory of self-replicating mRNA products and the impending catastrophe they pose for those affected is becoming increasingly clear.

Excess mortality in Germany since the introduction of the COVID “vaccine”—
An age-group-specific analysis Prof. Dr. Ing. habil. Dr. oec. Peter Dierich: The significant excess mortality, which began with the introduction of the COVID “vaccination” in 2021, continues through June 2026. However, its severity varies across the individual age groups. The three age groups from 60 to 74 are particularly hard hit by excess mortality. Excess mortality: facts instead of assumptions: Dr. Dirk Seeling.

New COVID-19 Files—What Role Did Spahn, Lauterbach, and the Federal Ministry of Health Play? New documents, old books—and suddenly many appear decisions made during the COVID-19 years appear in a different light. Alexander Kühn speaks with Dr. Sabine Stebel about her analysis of EU records, government documents, and the books by Jens Spahn and Georg Mascolo. The central question is:
To what extent was the federal government actually involved in vaccine procurement, contract negotiations, and liability issues? Particularly explosive are documents that, according to Stebel’s analysis, point to an early direct line of communication between the Federal Ministry of Health and BioNTech. She examines emails regarding vaccine procurement and the drafting of liability clauses. Was Health Minister Spahn (CDU) a representative of the people or a representative of the pharmaceutical industry?

Why the healthcare system is bankrupt and on the brink of collapse

Dr. Nina Pszolla (Specialist in Surgery/Trauma Surgery/Physical Medicine) on the need for radical change in the healthcare system. A presentation we highly recommend, offering suggestions for simplifying healthcare regulation. The concrete examples show that corruption and poor political decisions, left unchecked, throw existing funds out the window or squander them in waste-to-energy plants. I am certain that at least 20% of expenditures can be cut without any noticeable impact on patients. Lauterbach (SPD) is not only one of the main architects of the COVID-19 tyranny, including “mass murder” (they knew what the danger was), but also one of those who has been recommending the wrong solutions for decades (as has already been proven in court). Politicians must be held accountable for their actions when it becomes clear that they have abused the trust placed in them for personal or party-specific gain.

All leading COVID “experts” such as Fauci and Rochelle Walensky knew that cloth masks did not work and would fail. Nevertheless U.S. politicians called for more mask mandates and enforced mask-wearing in schools and among young children, which led to severe chronic illnesses and caused a massive increase in the number of mentallyand adolescents—and, in the future, young adults as well—to rise dramatically. Because they knew exactly what they were doing. They chose to remain uninformed so they could attribute the mistakes to ignorance or stupidity. Why did they do this? This is precisely why we need investigative committees and legal inquiries by prosecutors who are no longer subordinate to the ministers of justice—as was the case in Thuringia, where they were complicit in the directives. How is that supposed to work? Imagine if Nazi judges were to indict Goebbels while the Nazi regime was still in power, or if the GDR public prosecutor’s office were to prosecute Honecker and the officers of the Wall-shooting unit while the regime was still in operation.
This isn’t about trivial corruption. It’s about deliberate wrong decisions that resulted in mass deaths! Of course, every—and I emphasize EVERY—effort will be made to prevent this. However, cover-ups, ignorance, and a lack of transparency won’t help at all. There are too many people on the barricades! There will be a leniency program implemented by the public prosecutor’s office and the judiciary in, for example, Saxony-Anhalt, with impartial judicial representatives who will finally shed light on what the CDU, SPD, and Greens are trying to cover up in the Bundestag’s Enquete Commission. 

200 criminal complaints against BioNTech, PEI, and others. 200 people harmed by vaccines and relatives of deceased vaccine victims are now taking to the barricades in Germany. Katharina König, who has suffered severe harm, and attorney Tobias Ulbrich are the initiators. Ulbrich: “Since civil lawsuits have yielded little so far, we are now pursuing the Contergan lawsuit route.” A discussion also about cynical courts, an increasingly strong body of evidence, cover-ups by authorities, and the inhumane practices of social security offices—which refuse to recognize vaccine injuries, even those that Pfizer itself reported to the EMA. König and Ulbrich agree: the tide is slowly turning in Germany as well. In this CSmedicus conference, Tobias Ulbrich provides information, among other things, on how every individual—doctors, those affected, and their families—can take action.

Doctors with a Conscience
We are seeking all doctors who have taken a critical stance during the COVID-19 pandemic and have faced persecution or repercussions as a result.
Are you one of these doctors, or do you know one?
Then contact them and/or fill out the questionnaire. Here is information, a sample letter for doctors, and the questionnaire. You finally deserve to be heard. The Clearinghouse in the U.S., which was established by J.F. Kennedy Jr. for affected doctors and medical professionals in Germany, is an important initiative. German doctors who have been persecuted should contact the U.S. Office of Global Affairs (OGA) in the U.S.: https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/oga/index.html

A “NUREMBERG 2.0” FOR COVID-19 WAS ALREADY ANNOUNCED BY KENNEDY. The Nuremberg trials of medical professionals are little known, but they also involved crimes against humanity punishable by severe penalties, just like the trials of politicians and administrative leaders (concentration camp directors, etc., for whom, during the COVID era, similar powers were already demanded for the unvaccinated and, in some cases, implemented in Australia). We very much hope that this will clarify what “public officials,” acting on behalf of the state, are permitted to do to their citizens. “I was just doing what I was told to do.”
U.S.: Confession of Deception Against the American People and Anthony Fauci’s Diaries Reveal Outrageous Acts The first birds in the COVID-19 fraud scandal are beginning to sing. While Fauci remains vehemently silent before the Senate in Congress, his former senior advisor, David Morens, has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States. He was one of the key figures in the cover-up of COVID records. To circumvent Freedom of Information Act requests, he misled the public and government agencies. Senator Rand Paul has now referred the case to the Department of Justice, where a criminal investigation is underway against him and those involved. Fauci and his team, along with many others, demanded, among other things, that all pregnant women receive the mRNA gene therapy. However, CDC data showed that mothers face a 50% increased mortality rate for their babies. Mississippi has even declared a public health emergency due to skyrocketing infant mortality, which is now linked to transgenerational fatalities caused by this “vaccine.” The 30-year decline in infant mortality was documented immediately following the launch of the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign using mRNA vaccines. The causes of this above-chance infant mortality mirror symptoms observed in vaccinated adults and suggest the transfer of genetic material from the “vaccine” to offspring. Leaked text messages show that Fauci and his team knew as early as 2021 about the risks of miscarriage from the COVID vaccine and kept it secret. The Invisible Death – Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck: Analyses of Switzerland, Europe and the world confirm this trend even among vaccinated Swiss, Germans, and Europeans, showing a decline in infant births not in 2020 but since the vaccination campaign began in 2021. The response from the health ministries? Ignorance, silence during investigations, cover-ups, deception, and trickery. This will continue for as long as they can get away with it. Shame is no reason for those responsible to change their cover-up strategy.

Unrest is brewing at the WHO, and personnel consequences are following! 
Now that it has come to light that the human origin of COVID was covered up, some leaders are trying to reposition themselves. British scientist Jeremy Farrar is stepping down! Alongside Fauci and Drosten, Farrar was the global face of the fake pandemic, head of the Wellcome Trust (the second-largest pharmaceutical lobby after the Gates Foundation), the architect of the lockdowns, and most recently deputy director-general of the WHO.

Some believe he is a complete psychopath. Jeffrey Tucker (Brownstone Institute) claims to have evidence that the plan for lockdowns was already in place before the pandemic had even begun. Why? “To keep the population sick so that people would desperately demand the shots. Two weeks before the infamous ‘proximal origin’ article was written, Moderna had already begun work on a product they called a ‘vaccine’…. “They wanted masses and multitudes of people desperately clamoring for their magic potion.” More in the interview with Paul Brennan.

2. Politics: Current Interview—Germany, Europe, and the World

Migration Policy There is no more accurate summary of the unconstitutional migration policy that the German federal government and the EU have been pursuing for over a decade. Prof. Dr. Rupert Scholz, constitutional law expert and former Minister of Defense of the Federal Republic of Germany, lays out the facts. Every responsible citizen should be aware of these. As a reminder: Inevitably the end of our cultural sphere. Here it is again the open letter to the Bundestag regarding the UN Migration Pact and a reminder of VSTGB § 6 on genocide by Dipl. Ing. Frank-Ronald Gabler.

U.S./Europe/Germany: COVID-19 Vaccine Contracts/Analysis, Network Mapping, and Accountability Report Leland Lehrmann, Former MAHA director, who brought the persecution of German doctors to RF Kennedy Jr.’s attention, has kindly provided us with his papers as PDF files .

The Last Interview—What Germans Are Not Allowed to Know—with Dr. Dirk Seeling can be found here. A follow-up interview will be published next week.                                                                                                                                    

3. A decisive election in Saxony-Anhalt. Our interviews with the AfD. A health expert and a district administrator answer our questions

Interview with the AfD health expert from Saxony-Anhalt, Dr. Christina Baum (Member of the Bundestag).

A candid discussion between dentist and Member of the Bundestag Dr. Christina Baum and Dr. Dirk Seeling on the AfD’s health policy and its outlook for Saxony-Anhalt took place online. The upcoming election in Saxony-Anhalt on September 6, 2026, is being described as a decisive election for Germany. Media outlets such as *Der Spiegel* and public broadcasters are striving to cement the AfD’s image as a definitively far-right party. However, their success has been limited, as substantive debate is largely absent and the party’s leading candidates offer little to criticize.

Interested viewers and listeners will notice that institutions obligated to maintain neutrality—both the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and state-funded media and NGOs—are at risk of losing their independence. Thus, the *Der Spiegel* cover, which was designed to influence the election which portrayed AfD lead candidate Siegmund as the “most dangerous man,” ended up becoming one of the most effective measures in support of the AfD. In this conversation, we would like to learn firsthand what changes the AfD is seeking in health policy and what concrete ideas exist regarding this in Saxony-Anhalt.

How much “realpolitik” can the AfD handle? AfD District Administrator Sesselmann from Thuringia provides evidence from practice rather than mere assertions.

How much realpolitik can the AfD handle? We’re putting this to the test. In the east, nearly one in two eligible voters trusts the AfD to bring about change. In the west, it’s already one in four—that is, 25%—and the trend is rising. At the same time, it is repeatedly portrayed by politically controlled public broadcasting and other traditional media as undeniably far-right and out of touch with reality. As the intensity of these accusations grows and frustration with increasing ineffectiveness mounts, there are also increasingly better alternative media outlets available to help people form their own opinions about AfD politicians, their character, and their positions. As a result, more and more citizens are getting the impression that this is not about “saving democracy,” but rather about marginalizing a strong opposition while misusing our tax dollars.

CSmedicus aims to form its own opinion and provide information on the matter. The focus is on health policy and the cornerstones of the pragmatic implementation of the AfD’s demands. We spoke with two particularly important AfD party members who are also able to assess the feasibility of these proposals. You can read the interview with AfD health expert and Member of the Bundestag Dr. Christina Baum, who won her district in Saxony-Anhalt, at on our channel, and today we’re speaking with District Administrator and attorney Robert Sesselmann, who, as an AfD candidate in the Sonneberg district over the past three years, has been able to demonstrate whether the AfD merely complains or can actually achieve something.

Three years ago, the Sonneberg district and its district administrator made history. With Robert Sesselmann, an AfD politician was elected district administrator for the first—and so far only—time. The lawyer won the majority of the citizens’ support with 52.8 percent in the runoff election. After an initial voter turnout of less than 50 percent, nearly 60 percent turned out for the runoff election—a testament to the public’s faith in democracy. He has been leading this district since July 3, 2023.

What has been written about him since then often has little to do with his actual performance. Hardly any other district administrator in Germany is scrutinized as closely or judged as harshly as he is. Public broadcasters and major newspapers have long since declared him a political project —and they judge him not by his work, but by his party affiliation. His attempts to bring about change in the interest of the citizens are often met with resistance, but in the region he is also gaining more and more trust even among representatives of the other parties. The structures seem entrenched or, at the very least, inflexible. Some citizens believe: He must not be allowed to succeed.

Nevertheless, the results of these three years offer hope: Ladies and gentlemen, look forward to a behind-the-scenes look at the opportunities and challenges faced by a district administrator and the persecution by an opposition party. We’re not talking about the man who made history—we’re talking with him!

To the interesting conversation that describes Sesselmann as a person, his role as district administrator, and his dealings with media outlets that consistently work against him—yet he is successful despite this, or perhaps precisely because of it, since people in the East, based on their experience, are better able to distinguish between propaganda and neutral information. That is why the AfD has only 25% support in the West but 40% in the East. However, the trend is clear in the West as well. More and more people are rejecting the state and state media’s attempts to control their thinking. They want to form their own opinions and regain trust.